RESOURCE MENU
RESOURCE MENU
at 91福利社
Written by: Andrew J. Beckner
Can Great Academics survive鈥攅ven thrive鈥攁mid the rise of such a transformative technology? For a group of 91福利社 leaders charged with guiding its use at AU, the answer is clear.
Forget, for a moment if you can, the fears of AI. Forget the strange artwork it produces, the photos, the videos. Forget the erroneous information (or the eerily accurate information.) Forget that each time you use it, it seems to know a little more about you.
That鈥檚 not the point of the use of artificial intelligence at 91福利社. It serves a dual purpose: to further advance the foundational cause of Great Academics鈥攁nd to bring glory to the God who created all.
Just ask Professor Nathan Cox.
Professor Cox, charged with spearheading a committee at 91福利社 on the ethical use鈥攁nd the higher education implications鈥攐f AI, is keeping his team鈥檚 focus where it belongs: on how students learn and, through that learning, how they make the world a better place.
鈥淕enerative artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the information economy, to reshape all levels of education, including higher ed, and perhaps even to alter the nature of teaching and learning itself. AI will likely influence all manner of institutional operations, but I鈥檓 primarily interested in how it impacts student learning,鈥� Professor Cox said.
That commitment to possibility is driving a campus- wide strategy to integrate AI not only into academics, but also into the everyday operations of the institution. As AU positions itself as a leader among similar-sized institutions, administrators and faculty are working to make AI both a powerful tool and a responsible partner in the learning process.
Central to Anderson鈥檚 efforts is an understanding that AI is not merely a novelty鈥攊t is quickly becoming foundational to the future of work. Employers are already seeking graduates who are fluent in AI-assisted writing, content creation and data analysis. To meet this demand, AU sees it as a responsibility to equip students with the skills to use AI tools 鈥渃reatively, productively and ethically.鈥�
鈥淲e鈥檙e not just reacting to a trend,鈥� Professor Cox said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e preparing students for the world they鈥檙e about to enter鈥攁nd the world they鈥檒l be helping to shape.鈥�
That preparation goes beyond simply learning how to use a chatbot. It involves critical thinking about the role of AI in society, reflection on its ethical implications and engagement with the very human questions of authorship, ownership and originality.
And it starts with a fundamental shift in how AI is perceived in the classroom.
As AI tools like ChatGPT and Midjourney entered mainstream consciousness, many educators raised concerns about academic integrity. Could students use AI to cheat? Would traditional assignments lose meaning? What does it mean to do your own work when machines can write essays or generate solutions in seconds?
At Anderson, those questions are not ignored鈥攂ut they are reframed.
鈥淥ur mission isn鈥檛 to try to stop the inevitable advance of technology,鈥� Professor Cox said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 to partner with students in learning how to use it well.鈥�
Rather than relying on flawed AI detectors or punitive systems, AU is focusing on pedagogy that emphasizes process over product. Faculty are exploring new ways to design assignments that encourage iteration, feedback and reflection, approaches that benefit learning with or without AI tools.
鈥淪tudents need to be able to articulate what they鈥檝e learned, to reflect on their process and to evaluate the quality and accuracy of AI-generated content. That鈥檚 not just a workaround. That鈥檚 good teaching,鈥� Professor Cox said.
As a Christian university, AU also draws on its values to guide conversations around honesty, creativity and intellectual integrity.
鈥淭hat framework helps us,鈥� Professor Cox said. 鈥淚t gives us a shared language for talking about the value of our work and our responsibilities to one another.鈥�
While much of the public debate around AI centers on its risks, Anderson is also highlighting its opportunities.
Across the university, AI is being used to support marketing, streamline communication, analyze data and even aid in recruitment. But perhaps the most exciting opportunities are in the hands of students.
From generating study guides to editing essays, visualizing concepts, writing and debugging code, or translating content into another language, students are finding ways to use AI as a tutor, editor and creative partner.
Instructors, too, are experimenting.
鈥淲e can use this technology to make ourselves and our world better, but only if we treat it as a tool, and not a replacement for the gifts God has given us,鈥� said Dr. Katherine Wyma, associate professor of English in the 91福利社 College of Arts and Sciences. Dr. Wyma was among those charged with developing a framework for the ethical use of AI at AU.
And that last point is key: regardless of the advance of technology, God remains the foundation of the University鈥攁nd of the world.
鈥淚t鈥檚 the same challenges that are posed for society as a whole: what makes us human? How can we flourish where God has called us to be even with the challenges that AI offers? How can we see God鈥檚 provision for learning, work and play as integral to our humanity instead of seeking to replace those things with AI?,鈥� she said.
鈥淲e may be surprised by the arrival of AI, but God is not,鈥� she said. 鈥淭his is another opportunity for Christian scholars to answer perennial questions with foundational answers: how can we apply unchanging truth to a changing world?鈥�
This is the million-dollar question. For Professor Cox, he is optimistic.
鈥淲e鈥檒l continue emphasizing that there are times when students will need to use AI, and times when they will need to be able to work completely independently of it. The ethics of the AI industry and of any personal use of will need to be central to our conversations. Like any technology, AI can be used for positive and negative purposes. But staying focused on the learning and student success is critical,鈥� he said.
鈥淎fter all, that鈥檚 AU鈥檚 whole reason for being. If our students are successful, AU is successful. But so far, we have a pretty good track record of success. The growth and progress I鈥檝e seen in my 23 years at AU has been unique and special. I expect AI, with all its challenges and the rapid pace of change, will help us and our students go even farther.鈥�
Advisory Committee Members
AI @ AU
Professor Nathan Cox
Dr. Paige Ellisor-Catoe
Dr. Joni McCullar Criswell
Dr. Melanie Croft
Dr. Robert G. Franklin, Jr.
Dr. Martin Jones
Dr. Evie Maxey
Professor Jer Nelson
Professor Charity Yost Reed
Professor Bobby Rettew
Dr. S. Andrew Stowe
Chad Treado
Dr. Kimberly Whitehead
Dr. Katie Wolfe-Burleson
Dr. Katherine Cooper Wyma
Professor Nathan Cox
Dr. Paige Ellisor-Catoe
Dr. Joni McCullar Criswell
Dr. Melanie Croft
Dr. Robert G. Franklin, Jr.听
Dr. Martin Jones
Dr. Evie Maxey
Professor Jer Nelson
Professor Charity Yost Reed
Professor Bobby Rettew
Dr. S. Andrew Stowe
Chad Treado
Dr. Kimberly Whitehead
Dr. Katie Wolfe-Burleson
Dr. Katherine Cooper Wyma
Artificial Intelligence at 91福利社
Resources and Information
Artificial Intelligence at AU Vision Statement
Artificial Intelligence at AU Resources and Tutorials through the Thrift library
RESOURCE MENU
RESOURCE MENU